Psychology Quality Assurance Lead (QAL)
Up to $80/hr as listed
- Listed pay
- Up to $80/hr as listed
- Field
- Medicine
- Languages
- English
- Where
- United States
- Type
- Contract, remote
- Posted on SME Careers
- First seen here
- 9 October 2026
Summary
In this hourly, remote contractor role, you will work as a Psychology Quality Assurance Lead (QAL) to oversee quality, consistency, and trainer performance across psychology-focused AI training...
From the SME Careers listing
In this hourly, remote contractor role, you will work as a Psychology Quality Assurance Lead (QAL) to oversee quality, consistency, and trainer performance across psychology-focused AI training projects. You will review AI-generated psychology content and trainer/QA work, evaluate output quality against project guidelines, provide precise written feedback, and ensure that all contributors follow the expected quality standards.
You will assess work for psychological accuracy, theory application, research literacy, ethical awareness, mental-health safety, diagnostic caution, clarity, formatting, instruction-following, and adherence to project-specific rubrics. You will spot recurring quality issues, communicate updates to trainers and QAs, support onboarding, maintain documentation, and help activate contributors who are not working consistently. This role requires strong psychology expertise, strong English communication skills, excellent attention to detail, structured communication, and the ability to manage quality workflows across remote expert teams.
This role is with SME Careers, a fast-growing AI Data Services company and subsidiary of SuperAnnotate, delivering training data for many of the world’s largest AI companies and foundation-model labs. Your psychology quality leadership will directly help improve the world’s premier AI models by ensuring that psychology training data is accurate, ethical, appropriately cautious, research-informed, and aligned with client expectations.
Selection process involves an AI interview, a domain-specific task, and an interview with a recruiter.
Important:
There is no immediate project for this role; however, if qualified, you will be among the first experts we reach out to when relevant opportunities arise. This will also provide you with access to future projects available through our expert network.
Responsibilities
- Quality monitoring: Spot-check psychology items, identify quality issues, provide ongoing feedback through DMs, and escalate recurring or critical issues.
- Psychology review: Evaluate AI-generated psychology explanations, mental-health content, research summaries, behavioral guidance, theory applications, and safety-sensitive responses for accuracy and appropriateness.
- Trainer and QA communication: Update trainers and QAs on Discord about new item guidelines, project changes, workflow updates, quality expectations, and psychology-specific review standards.
- Question handling: Respond to trainer/QA questions clearly and promptly, especially around psychological concepts, evidence quality, ethical boundaries, mental-health safety, diagnostic caution, and rubric interpretation.
- Trainer/QA activation management: DM contributors who are inactive or not working, encourage activation, track follow-ups, and flag availability issues when needed.
- Documentation: Create and maintain psychology project documentation, including style guides, trackers, FAQs, quality notes, examples, honeypots, calibration tasks, and onboarding materials.
- Onboarding and training: Schedule and run onboarding/training calls with trainers and QAs to explain project expectations, workflows, rubrics, quality standards, and psychology-specific review requirements.
- Quality alignment: Ensure all trainers and QAs apply psychology-review guidelines consistently and understand updates as projects evolve.
- Safety and ethics review: Flag unsafe, overconfident, stigmatizing, pseudoscientific, diagnostically inappropriate, or crisis-insensitive psychology content.
- Process improvement: Identify recurring quality gaps, propose workflow improvements, and help build scalable QA processes for psychology AI training projects.
Requirements
- Bachelor’s, Master’s, PhD, PsyD, or equivalent professional background in Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Counseling, Behavioral Science, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, Social Work, Psychiatry-adjacent research, Education, or a closely related field.
- Strong grasp of the English language to follow project guidelines, communicate with teams, and provide clear written feedback.
- 3+ years of experience in psychology research, clinical/counseling settings, behavioral science, teaching, academic writing, mental-health content review, psychological assessment, or related workflows.
- Strong understanding of psychological theories, research methods, cognitive and social psychology, developmental psychology, abnormal psychology, ethics, evidence-based practice, and mental-health safety considerations.
- Ability to evaluate psychology content against detailed rubrics and identify issues such as overdiagnosis, unsafe advice, unsupported claims, flawed study interpretation, pseudoscience, stigmatizing language, or inappropriate therapeutic recommendations.
- Familiarity with areas such as CBT, developmental psychology, personality, trauma-informed communication, behavioral interventions, mental-health literacy, research design, statistics, and ethical guidelines is preferred.
- Experience leading or supporting remote teams of researchers, clinicians, educators, reviewers, annotators, or QAs is strongly preferred.
- Comfortable working in fast-moving remote environments using tools such as Discord, Google Sheets, Google Docs, trackers, dashboards, and project management systems.
- Highly detail-oriented and organized, with the ability to maintain style guides, FAQs, trackers, onboarding materials, calibration tasks, and documentation.
- Experience with AI training, data annotation, LLM evaluation, psychology QA, mental-health content review, or rubric-based review is a strong plus.
Text above is the platform's own listing, shown as published. Check the details on SME Careers before applying.
Prepare for the assessment
Practice questions and what each platform says about its screening for this kind of role:
Terms in this listing
- Guidelines
- The project's written instructions that define how to do a task and how to judge answers. On most projects they take precedence over personal preference.
- Instruction following
- Whether a model did exactly what was asked, including constraints such as length, format, language or things to avoid.
- Rubric
- A written list of criteria and scores used to judge a response, for example accuracy, instruction following and tone, each with clear pass or fail descriptions.
- AI interview
- A screening interview run by an AI system instead of a person, usually spoken or on video, with questions about your background and skills.
- Calibration
- Exercises where raters do the same tasks and compare results with the expected answers, so everyone applies the guidelines the same way.
Related roles
Medical Doctor (Specialist)
Up to $150/hr as listed
- Medicine
- English
- 17 countries
Radiologist
Up to $120/hr as listed
- Medicine
- English
- 17 countries
Biomedical Engineering Quality Assurance Lead (QAL)
Up to $105/hr as listed
- Medicine
- English
- United States
Healthcare Specialist – Rubric Design
Up to $100/hr as listed
- Medicine
- English
- United States
CBRN Specialist
Up to $100/hr as listed
- Medicine
- English
- 31 countries